IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2Objectives
Test Category
Target
Procedures
The target product must pass the 100% of self-test items.
For about interoperability, there are two ways in the self-test (inhouse
test) base and interoperability test event base.
(*1) The participation to the interoperability event is not mandatory. The approval of logo usage is based on the test specification. This means that the test procedure for logo of Phase-2 at the interoperability event must be exectly based on the test specification. And, when the product does not satisfy the test specification, the product can not be approved, even if the product has far advanced functions and interoperability with many other products.With regards to the validation by the interoperability event, there needs to be a coordinator's endorsement for test report.
(*2) The test evidence should include the following items.
(*3) You can also send the test evidence via web page, if your evidence is very huge to send by e-mail. Please go this page.
- Configuration
- Command result
- Test result
- Packet dump file
- Others (If required)
(*4) You can see this Usage Agreement to get reference document before your application. If you don't agree with this Usage Agreement, we can't approve your usage of the Phase-2 IPv6 Ready Logo.
Criteria
(*5) 4 interoperable devices should be different. Different devices have different software origins and knowledge of this resides in the public domain. If devices have the same software origins, they are not "different".
- The devices are not "different" if they contain the same stack on different hardware platforms. This may cause slight variation in software behavior, but it will not vary enough to be defined as "different".
Example:
ROUTER: OS-A on Vendor-A PC
ROUTER: OS-A on Vendor-B PC
HOST: OS-A on Vendor-C PC
HOST: OS-A on Vendor-D PC- The devices are not "different" if they contain the same stack on different operating systems or operating system versions. This may cause slight variation in software behavior, but it will not vary enough to be defined as "different".
Example1:
ROUTER: OS-A Version.A
ROUTER: OS-A Version.B
HOST: OS-A Version.C
HOST: OS-A Version.D
Example2:
ROUTER: OS-A Version.A
ROUTER: OS-A Version.B
HOST: OS-B Version.A
HOST: OS-B Version.B
Example3:
ROUTER: Kame Stack on NetBSD
ROUTER: Kame Stack on FreeBSD
HOST: Usagi Stack on Linux
HOST: Kame Stack on OpenBSD
- Devices may be "different" if they contain an embeded component. Some devices may be "different" if they contain a software stack that was integrated onto 2 different types of hardware where the origins are not distinguishable. In this case it will be assumed that the systems in question are "different" unless the knowledge that they come from the same software stack is in the public domain.
Technical Issues
Last Modified at 2008/12/25